As another example of a process that seems to be working well (as far as I can tell by being a lurker) check out the xml-dist-app mailing list archives at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/ They have a draft up in the web [1] and the Subject lines directly refer to such and such sections of the draft. When you discuss an issue it's unambiguous what you are talking about. Of course, as almost always, "working well" is a direct function of the editors time and skill... [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/ -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Re: Proposal for groups Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposal for groups Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Proposal for groups Casey R. Tweten
- Re: Proposal for groups Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Proposal for groups Simon Cozens
- Designers step forward now Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposal for groups Alan Burlison
- Re: Proposal for groups Simon Cozens
- Re: Proposal for groups Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Proposal for groups Adam Turoff
- Re: Proposal for groups Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Proposal for groups Alan Burlison
- Re: Proposal for groups Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposal for groups Alan Burlison
- Re: Proposal for groups Adam Turoff
- Re: Proposal for groups Alan Burlison
- Re: Proposal for groups Simon Cozens
- Re: Proposal for groups Tim Bunce
- Re: Proposal for groups Simon Cozens
- Re: Proposal for groups Nathan Torkington
- Markup wars (was Re: Proposal ... Bennett Todd