On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 07:56:21AM +0000, Alan Burlison wrote: > How are you going to publish the design? Asking people to follow email > discussions and try to piece together what is proposed from that doesn't > seem a very optimal way to go about it. How about a design document > (format to be decided) and a 'design + commentary' document which is the > design document with the condensed email discussion inserted into it as > the commentary. Are you asking for a Design Document (tm) to be published/updated along with an Annotated Design Document (tm)? Sounds like what Tim Bray did for the XML Spec at http://www.xml.com/axml/testaxml.htm. Perl6 should produce something like that as part of the design process. Z.
- Re: Proposal for groups Uri Guttman
- Re: Proposal for groups Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposal for groups Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Proposal for groups Casey R. Tweten
- Re: Proposal for groups Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Proposal for groups Simon Cozens
- Designers step forward now Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposal for groups Alan Burlison
- Re: Proposal for groups Simon Cozens
- Re: Proposal for groups Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Proposal for groups Adam Turoff
- Re: Proposal for groups Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Proposal for groups Alan Burlison
- Re: Proposal for groups Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposal for groups Alan Burlison
- Re: Proposal for groups Adam Turoff
- Re: Proposal for groups Alan Burlison
- Re: Proposal for groups Simon Cozens
- Re: Proposal for groups Tim Bunce
- Re: Proposal for groups Simon Cozens
- Re: Proposal for groups Nathan Torkington