On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 09:45:55AM -0700, Steve Fink wrote: > Hey, it's finally a use for the 'use less space/use less time' pragma! > 'use less space' means share the bytecode and either do computed jumps > or unshared lookup tables; 'use less time' means fixup unshared bytecode > at load time (or page fault time, or whatever). :-) I thought so far we'd only had "use more". I like "use less" and what it offers us: use English; can be replaced with use less "line noise"; :-) Nicholas Clark
- Re: [not quite an RFC] shared bytecode/optree Simon Cozens
- Re: [not quite an RFC] shared bytecode/optree Chaim Frenkel
- Re: [not quite an RFC] shared bytecode/optree Nicholas Clark
- Re: [not quite an RFC] shared bytecode/optree Dan Sugalski
- Re: [not quite an RFC] shared bytecode/optree Nicholas Clark
- Re: [not quite an RFC] shared bytecode/opt... Dan Sugalski
- Re: [not quite an RFC] shared bytecod... Nicholas Clark
- Re: [not quite an RFC] shared bytecode/optree Tom Hughes
- Re: [not quite an RFC] shared bytecode/optree Nicholas Clark
- Re: [not quite an RFC] shared bytecode/optree Steve Fink
- Re: [not quite an RFC] shared bytecode/optree Nicholas Clark
- Re: [not quite an RFC] shared bytecode/optree Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: [not quite an RFC] shared bytecode/optree Chaim Frenkel