Re: [not quite an RFC] shared bytecode/optree

[Simon Cozens]

On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:41:38PM -0700, Benjamin Stuhl wrote:
> It seems to me that one thing that the perl6 bytecode
> implementation _should_ do (in the interests of being light
> and fast, as well as meshing well with MT) is be
> position-independant.

Fancy offering a patch to RFC310?

-- 
If they can put a man on the moon, why can't they put them all there?