renaming local to "hold"

[David L. Nicol]

Nathan Torkington wrote:

> I'd rather not revisit this, or any other, RFC until Larry's had a
> chance to *really* comment and put forward his suggestions. 

I think pitching renames for "local" is at least as worthwhile as
pitching code names.  How about "Hold?"  It isn't listed in Blackstone's
RFC 19, and it focuses on the restore-later aspects -- put that variable
on hold, like it is a phone call, while you do something else with your
ear.


-- 
                          David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                 I don't watch TV, I have no telephone, and I vote