Jeremy Howard wrote: > > I haven't got around to RFCing the more generic version (that all attributes > are inherited inside nested data types), but that would certainly be a nice > approach. Not to confuse, let's call it cascading instead of inheritance. -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Bart Lateur
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $... John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Lea... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1)... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Lea... John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $... John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Glenn Linderman