Nathan Wiger wrote: > I pushed a lot of these issues in RFC 319 and 337, which would let you > say something like: > > my Pet @pets :mean; # integrated implicit tie > @pets->attributes('mean') # "true", like 'can' Blech. exists @pets:mean # true -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Bart Lateur
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $... John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Lea... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1)... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Lea... John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $... John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Glenn Linderman