Bart Lateur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But anyway: whould this imply that URL- and simple HTML escaping and > back, will now be available through pack()/unpack()? Just like UUE? > ;-) Adding base64 encoding/decoding and quoted-printable would also be useful. Either that, or taking uuencode out of pack and putting it plus those other things into a standard module. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support James Mastros
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Robert Mathews
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support H . Merijn Brand
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support iain truskett
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Robert Mathews