On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 12:09:20PM -0400, James Mastros wrote: > Really, I don't see why we can't > just have a 'use taint' and 'no taint' pargma. Because taint mode needs to be turned on REEELY early, like before pragmas are compiled. Z.
- RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support iain truskett
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Supp... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support James Mastros
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Robert Mathews
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support H . Merijn Brand
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 288 (v2) First-Class CGI Support Philip Newton