On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, David Grove wrote: [...] > I don't know, it just doesn't feel like the holes are closed. How do we let > people "nab it and do good things with it", but prohibit people from "nabbing > it and doing bad things with it"? Personally I don't care. For all I care anyone can do all the bad and evil with it they want to, as long as they don't prevent me or others from doing good things with it. If the "bad people" make something useful after all, hey great - more useful software for us! If they don't, well... who cares then? - ask -- ask bjoern hansen - <http://www.netcetera.dk/~ask/> more than 70M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>
- RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Changes from 2.0beta2 to 2.0beta3 Bradley M. Kuhn
- Differences between Artistic-2.0beta4 and Artisti... Bradley M. Kuhn
- RE: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|A... David Grove
- Issues of (6c) in Artistic-2.0 (was Re: RFC 3... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Why (7) and (8) in the Artistic-2.0 (was Re: ... Bradley M. Kuhn
- RE: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|A... David Grove
- Re: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (G... Bradley M. Kuhn
- RE: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|A... David Grove
- Re: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (G... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Ask Bjoern Hansen