On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 07:56:49PM -0700, Daniel Chetlin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 12:56:44AM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > > Why isn't there a documentation w/g? Yes, this is a hint. > > My RFC 240 garnered exactly 0 responses, so there doesn't seem to be > much of an interest. I was trying to decide today whether I should > freeze or withdraw. I agree that there should be a documentation w/g, but I personally believe it is premature to set up such a group, since there is no perl6 to document. Z.
- *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Nathan Wiger
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Simon Cozens
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Stephen Zander
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Simon Cozens
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Daniel Chetlin
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Adam Turoff
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close ... Daniel Chetlin
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting cl... iain truskett
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting cl... Daniel Chetlin
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Dan Sugalski
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Stephen Zander
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Adam Turoff