On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 04:54:36PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote: > Not necessarily. Nat recently posted about his misinterpretation of > Larry's plans but said he still planned to lean on people to finish by > October 1 otherwise they'd never get done. Yuh, I just realised that the bulk of the ones I have to write are internals and Unicode, and there's only a couple of language. And documentation. Why isn't there a documentation w/g? Yes, this is a hint. -- The trouble with computers is that they do what you tell them, not what you want. -- D. Cohen
- *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Nathan Wiger
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Simon Cozens
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Stephen Zander
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Simon Cozens
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Daniel Chetlin
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Adam Turoff
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close ... Daniel Chetlin
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting cl... iain truskett
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting cl... Daniel Chetlin
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Dan Sugalski
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Stephen Zander
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Adam Turoff