At 02:55 PM 9/27/00 -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > Well, the impression I get from Larry is that he wants the internals to be
> > character-formatting neutral. Scalars should be able to provide their
> > contents in a number of different formats, but perl would usually not have
> > One True Format internally.
>
> > I think the intention is that if data comes in in ASCII or EBCDIC or
> > Unicode or Shift-JIS or binary or whatever then perl will keep it that way
> > if it understands the format, and convert as needed by bits of the core.
>
>This seems sensible, but "convert as needed" is going to be the tricky
>part:-) and we'll need to allow for appropriate directives to keep the
>DWIMmer from getting confused in unusual situations.
Perl will, presumably, know how to go from A to B, and deal with that. If
you do something that wants UTF8 and your scalar's got EBCDIC data in it,
then perl will do the conversion on the fly.
>I don't think there's any real disagreement on these ideas, but there is
>one additional issue that I think hasn't been fully appreciated:
>
>I want to be able to do all this *without* having to become a Unicode
>expert (or even Unicode-literate).
I expect that Larry'll get it right. I also want it really easy to not have
to bother, since my data sources are all plain ASCII too.
I have no doubt that Simon and I will have plenty of fun going back and
forth on this one... :)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
