Hang on... \I \E amounts to the same number of characters as using '. .' (that is, terminating this q-string, concat the thing, start a new q-string) So for scalars, there would be no savings at all. For arrays, yes, the proposed \I \E would still be useful. Maybe the \I should just scan for the following scalar/array var name and automatically turn itself off again. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single quoti... Jerrad Pierce
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Jerrad Pierce
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in sin... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in sin... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolatio... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in sin... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in sin... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Philip Newton