> Hang on... \I \E amounts to the same number of characters as using > '. .' (that is, terminating this q-string, concat the thing, start > a new q-string) You can't do that in a <<'HERE' doc. > For arrays, yes, the proposed \I \E would still be useful. Maybe the > \I should just scan for the following scalar/array var name and > automatically turn itself off again. No thanks. Suppose I want: '$x = $a; $y = func(\I$arg1, $arg2, $arg3\E); #etc. ' Unless it scans ahead and if it fails to find a \E, then it turns itself off after the first interpolation >:-) Damian
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single quoti... Jerrad Pierce
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Jerrad Pierce
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in sin... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in sin... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolatio... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in sin... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in sin... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Andy Dougherty