>But a Hash isn't the correct data structure either. It just has some, >of the correct properties. Whatever. >Perhaps we should add a Set to the toolkit. Basically a hash with >only the keys, no other baggage. Define "toolkit". >But you still would argue against the operators/functions? Ignoring >spelling. In Perl? Of course. In a module? Of course not. --tom
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... John Porter
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions fro... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions fro... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode