>The underlying problem is that arrays don't make SENSE as an >implementation for sets. And even in those rare places where they do, to use them as such is gratuitously counter-efficient. --tom
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions... John Porter
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... John Porter
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions fro... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions fro... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode