Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses

[Nathan Torkington]

John Porter writes:
> I for one hope he's not doing that, because it would tend to favor
> ideas that made it Frozen status sooner.  I don't believe the temporal
> aspect of these things is relevant at all.

I'm not feeding Larry anything.  He's been watching discussions as
RFCs evolve, and is welcome to peruse the list at any time.  He's his
own man as far as I'm concerned.

Nat