Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses

[Nathan Torkington]

Adam Turoff writes:
> I want to assert to the reader that there have been no substantive
> changes since v3 if an RFC was frozen at v3, but is currently v5.
> 
> A "Frozen Since: v3" attribute should make this apparent.

Sure.  And rather than rediddling all the other RFCs, only introduce
this when the frozen version and the current version no longer match.
Good enough is good enough.

Nat