On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:40:31PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: > > Are there any better reasons than "It would be nice?" > > Can there *be* a better reason than "It would be nice"? Seriously, > niceness is a damned fine goal. No, it isn't. Practical wins over nice any day. Fast probably wins over nice, too. Just because something's easy to code, that doesn't mean we should code it, or all perl6 will do is print "hello world". Sheesh, it's going to be a wonder if we get that far. -- >God Save the Queen! And let Satan take the Prime Minister... - Tanuki, in the monastery.
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Ken Fox
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Philip Newton
- No, not A, but A David L. Nicol
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl Implementation Langua... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language raptor
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Tom Hughes
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Tom Hughes
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Daniel Chetlin