Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 03:17:47PM -0400, Ken Fox wrote: > > That's fine for the VM and the support libraries, but I'd *really* > > like to see the parser/front-end in Perl. There are dozens of RFCs > > that require some non-trivial extensions to the parser. It would > > be nice to code these in Perl > > Are there any better reasons than "It would be nice?" Can there *be* a better reason than "It would be nice"? Seriously, niceness is a damned fine goal. -- Piers
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Ken Fox
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Philip Newton
- No, not A, but A David L. Nicol
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl Implementation Langua... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language raptor
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Tom Hughes
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Tom Hughes
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Nick Ing-Simmons