Adam Turoff wrote: > *: Sarathy tells me that Perforce sucks at maintaining thousands of > anonymous checkouts, while CVS doesn't mind at all. This is a perfect > reason to use anon CVS vs. Perforce, but does not require that Perforce be > ditched in favor of CVS, only that an anon CVS gateway be maintained. Will this anonymous gateway have all the relevant meta-data? Will it look, to a user of the gateway, like the live repository is CVS when they go hunting through metadata? -- Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn
- Re: code repository Dan Sugalski
- Re: code repository Bennett Todd
- Re: code repository Dan Sugalski
- Re: code repository Alan Burlison
- Re: code repository Adam Turoff
- Re: code repository Nathan Torkington
- Re: code repository Michael G Schwern
- Re: code repository Nathan Torkington
- Re: code repository Bennett Todd
- Re: code repository Dan Sugalski
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of met... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of met... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of met... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of met... Dan Sugalski
- Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of metadat... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of met... Barrie Slaymaker
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of met... Barrie Slaymaker
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of met... Adam Turoff
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of met... Barrie Slaymaker
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of met... Adam Turoff
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of met... Barrie Slaymaker