At 05:27 PM 9/8/00 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote: > >>>>> "AT" == Adam Turoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >AT> that is lost is who actually made any specific update; all changes >AT> are made by 'cvs-bot' or somesuch. > >Is this a programming issue? or something more fundemental. > >(is it time and effort or a mismatch between perforce and CVS?) Perforce keeps that information, so we should be able to get at it somehow. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: code repository Alan Burlison
- Re: code repository Adam Turoff
- Re: code repository Nathan Torkington
- Re: code repository Michael G Schwern
- Re: code repository Nathan Torkington
- Re: code repository Bennett Todd
- Re: code repository Dan Sugalski
- Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without los... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without los... Chaim Frenkel
- Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of... Dan Sugalski
- Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without los... Barrie Slaymaker
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without los... Barrie Slaymaker
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without los... Adam Turoff
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without los... Barrie Slaymaker
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without los... Adam Turoff
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without los... Barrie Slaymaker
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without los... Adam Turoff
- Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without los... iain truskett
- Re: code repository Adam Turoff