Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In string @ must be \@" error

[Nathan Wiger]

"Randal L. Schwartz" wrote:
> 
> What would be NICE is to treat @stonehenge here as *always* a variable

> So, I'd support a modification to the RFC that does what Larry intended
> here:
> 
>         array interpolation should work exactly like scalar interpolation

That was actually the intent of the RFC, but I'll update v2 to make it
clearer.

Thanks,
Nate