Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In string @ must be \@" error

[Kai Henningsen]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Wiger)  wrote on 15.08.00 in 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> > I'd say, if the variable exists, interpolate it.  If not, print it as
> > it stands.
>
> I initially was thinking this too, but there's a major problem:
>
>    print "Your stuff is: @stuff\n";
>
> I want this to *always* print out the _value_ of @stuff, even if it's
> unititalized.

Uninitialized != doesn't exist. Not arguing for or against the RFC, just  
pointing out the difference.

MfG Kai