Michael G Schwern writes:
> In effect, instead of having one development track, we could have many
> development tracks, each focused on a single feature, or small group
> of features. This should make work easier, because on each track only
> one thing is changing, so its easier to track down new bugs.
I think we're talking different scenarios. This implies there already
is code. I've only been talking about the first version of perl6,
getting it out the door. The existing pumpkings have had plenty of
experience with branches ("fork" is such a dirty word :-) in the source
tree, and can give advice on how it works when you already have code.
I view branches in this initial version as highly unlikely to be
useful. We need to have a trunk before we can have branches.
Nat
