Too early in the morning, I wrote: > > I might like to see something like URI suggested: > > > > attr3 => [ALL] > > It was (and is) a good suggestion. I suspect however that it should be > > attr3 => [__ALL__] > > so that classes can still have an C<ALL> method delegated. > (Yes, now they can't have an C<__ALL__> method, > but maybe that's a Good Thing ;-) Stupid, stupid, stupid! Of course, that should be: attr3 => __ALL__ and then delegated methods can be named any(crazy)thing. Damian
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method delega... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method delega... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method d... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method d... David E. Wheeler
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method d... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for meth... David E. Wheeler
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for ... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support ... David E. Wheeler
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for meth... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method delega... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method d... David E. Wheeler