> > > This way, I know that an empty arrayref means "all methods" > > > rather than "none." > > > > Kinda redundant since that's the default behaviour, but perhaps > > useful as a documentation mechanism. > > Unless you change the default behavio[u]r to "don't delegate any method > calls to this object!". Err, that *is* the default behaviour. Delegation doesn't occur unless you specify it. Or am I missing your meaning here? Damian
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method deleg... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method deleg... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method deleg... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method deleg... David E. Wheeler
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method deleg... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method deleg... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method ... David E. Wheeler
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for met... David E. Wheeler
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support... David E. Wheeler
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for met... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method deleg... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method ... David E. Wheeler