Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to initializers and destructors

[Matt Youell]

> goes?  Your logic suggests that I'd never want to meddle in the base's
> implementation.

What happens when the base classes' author finally fixes the problem you
wrote around (and incidentally changes touchy implementation details in the
base)? What happens someday when you can't see the implementation of the
base class that you are inheriting from? Ack!!! =^)


Matt