On 9/1/00 8:39 PM, Tom Christiansen wrote: > What happens on reblessing? Go back to the old behavior in that case? (Re-blessing has always smelled like "Perl casting" to me...ick.) Maybe we'd need an "unbless" to round out the desired (evil ;) functionality. -John
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls t... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarc... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hie... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hie... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarc... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to initial... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to initial... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to in... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls t... Matt Youell
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls t... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarc... John Siracusa