But scalars are not compact. Nathan Wiger wrote: > To avoid anyone getting yelled at by TomC or someone else: Yes. Anything > individual in Perl is a scalar. By definition. Please don't try to > change this. > > For more details on this, please read this email: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language@perl.org/msg00329.html > > Under these definitions - which are at the core of Perl - piddles are > just @arrays (maybe special arrays, though, see Buddha's RFC) and do not > warrant their own data type. Yes, I do view this as a good thing. > > -Nate There are issues with references and subroutine argument passing which must be clarifies before one can decide on whether piddles can be @arrays Karl
- Re: New variable type: matrix Christian Soeller
- Re: New variable type: matrix Damian Conway
- Re: New variable type: matrix Nathan Wiger
- Re: New variable type: matrix Buddha Buck
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard
- Re: New variable type: matrix Christian Soeller
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard
- Re: New variable type: matrix Baris
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jim Edwards
- Re: New variable type: matrix Nathan Wiger
- Re: New variable type: matrix Karl Glazebrook
- Re: New variable type: matrix Dan Sugalski
- Re: New variable type: matrix Karl Glazebrook
- Re: New variable type: matrix Dan Sugalski
- Re: New variable type: matrix Baris
- Re: New variable type: matrix Christian Soeller
- Re: New variable type: matrix Dan Sugalski
- Re: New variable type: matrix Karl Glazebrook
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard
- Re: New variable type: matrix Christian Soeller
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard