> I think the better way is to take Buddha's idea (soon to be RFC'ed, by > the sounds of it), and make current arrays a little more flexible. It > sounds like we'll just have to add an extra dimension somehow, and then > "arrays of compact arrays" will simply be "arrays with some compact > elements". This sounds more flexible and less bloated to me. Thanks for the vote of confidence... The RFC was sent to the RFC editor this afternoon (about 7 hours ago as I type), but it doesn't look processed yet. If it doesn't turn up by the time I get to work tomorrow (09:00 -0400 (EDT)), I'll send an unnumbered copy to perl6-language-data. > > -Nate -- Buddha Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Just as the strength of the Internet is chaos, so the strength of our liberty depends upon the chaos and cacophony of the unfettered speech the First Amendment protects." -- A.L.A. v. U.S. Dept. of Justice
- Re: New variable type: matrix Buddha Buck
- Re: New variable type: matrix Nathan Wiger
- Re: New variable type: matrix Karl Glazebrook
- Re: New variable type: matrix Buddha Buck
- Re: New variable type: matrix Doug Hunt
- Re: New variable type: matrix Christian Soeller
- Re: New variable type: matrix Doug Hunt
- Re: New variable type: matrix Christian Soeller
- Re: New variable type: matrix Damian Conway
- Re: New variable type: matrix Nathan Wiger
- Re: New variable type: matrix Buddha Buck
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard
- Re: New variable type: matrix Christian Soeller
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard
- Re: New variable type: matrix Baris
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jim Edwards
- Re: New variable type: matrix Nathan Wiger
- Re: New variable type: matrix Karl Glazebrook
- Re: New variable type: matrix Dan Sugalski
- Re: New variable type: matrix Karl Glazebrook
- Re: New variable type: matrix Dan Sugalski