Dan Sugalski wrote: > >It would be bad to have multiple RFCs suggesting the same thing. > > Nope, it wouldn't be. > > Don't assume that any particular RFC will be accepted in its entirety > either--it's always possible that Larry'll take the good bits and leave the > rest... > > Dan Meanwhile we all go rambling around on cross-threads and come up with no coherent set of proposals. Karl
- Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing Buddha Buck
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and sl... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing an... Dan Sugalski
- Access to the perl6 parser Jim Edwards
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Dan Sugalski
- Re: Access to the perl6 pa... Jim Edwards
- Re: Access to the perl6 pa... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Access to the perl6 pa... Christian Soeller
- Re: Access to the perl6 pa... Jim Edwards
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexi... Christian Soeller
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matri... Nathan Torkington