> > > Regardless, you can already do this in perl 5, and will undoubtedly be able > to do it in perl 6, with source filters. So why do we have to do $ip1=$i+1; # my pdl pet peave $f->slice("(0),$ip1,$i"); instead of $f((0),$i+1,$i); # substitute your favorite syntax here ? Must be source filters have problems? My guess is it's possible but a lot of work? Or is it ?
- Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing Buddha Buck
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and sl... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing an... Dan Sugalski
- Access to the perl6 parser Jim Edwards
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Dan Sugalski
- Re: Access to the perl6 pa... Jim Edwards
- Re: Access to the perl6 pa... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Access to the perl6 pa... Christian Soeller
- Re: Access to the perl6 pa... Jim Edwards
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexi... Christian Soeller
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matri... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposed RFC for matri... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matri... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Proposed RFC for matri... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Proposed RFC for matri... Bart Lateur