On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 02:29:33PM -0400, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote: > > > Any requirements on how solid an implementation section should be > > should be left to the working group chairs. > > Sorry, I don't understand this. What is the WGC's role here? My english native language is? :-) I meant to say that if there are to be more stringent requirements as to what should be in an implementation section, I leave that decision to the WGC. It's not the job of the librarian to reject an RFC because it lacks sample code, but if the WGC wants to be stricter, I will try and abide on a per-group basis. Z.
- Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections John Porter
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Adam Turoff
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Tom Hughes
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Nathan Wiger
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Adam Turoff
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sectio... Adam Turoff
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION s... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATI... Adam Turoff
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Bart Lateur
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections David L. Nicol