Re: Proposal for IMPLEMENTATION sections

[Bart Lateur]

On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 17:54:17 -0400, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote:

>The IMPLEMENTATION section of the RFC is supposed to be mandatory, but
>there have been an awful lot of RFCs posted that have missing or
>evasive IMPLEMENTATION sections.  I found more than 39% of all RFCs
>have a missing or incomplete implementation section.  

There's a reason why -language and -internals are separate lists. (duck
and run).

-- 
        Bart.