Re: Fwd: Re: Automated "no status" messages

[Nathan Torkington]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The way people seem to be showing the status of RFCs is by putting
> "Status: foo" up near the maintainer info etc.  This makes good sense.
> Can this be reflected in the sample RFC and the instructions and so on?

I've been asking Adam to do this, but I suspect he's rather busy.
Adam?

Nat