The way people seem to be showing the status of RFCs is by putting
"Status: foo" up near the maintainer info etc. This makes good sense.
Can this be reflected in the sample RFC and the instructions and so on?
K.
----- Forwarded message from Peter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
>From: Peter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Automated "no status" messages
>Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 09:20:01 -0700
>
>At 05:31 PM 8/28/00 +1000, you wrote:
>>I've just run a nasty hairy script over the RFC repository and sent
>>email to those people who I think have language RFCs but haven't put
>>statuses on them yet.
>
>Whee can I find out what 'frozen' means? I'm looking at links under
>http://dev.perl.org/rfc/meta/, but none of them mention a status field,
>only an optional STATUS section that's something else.
>
>--
>Peter Scott
>Pacific Systems Design Technologies
>
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Kirrily Robert -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://netizen.com.au/
Open Source development, consulting and solutions
Level 10, 500 Collins St, Melbourne VIC 3000
Phone: +61 3 9614 0949 Fax: +61 3 9614 0948 Mobile: +61 410 664 994
