> Do we have an RFC yet that proposes Perl to be easier parsable? > Damian? Working on it. Damian
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit ... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit ... John Porter
- New match and subst replacements f... Nathan Wiger
- Re: New match and subst replacemen... Mark Senn
- Re: New match and subst replacemen... Randy J. Ray
- Re: New match and subst replacemen... Nathan Wiger
- Re: New match and subst replacemen... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit ... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches,... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, ev... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, even with ?... Damian Conway
- RE: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, even with ??... Fisher Mark
