Bart Lateur wrote: > I *like* the =~ syntax, ich auch. > and I would hope we could extend it > to more functions that change one of their parameters, like > sysread/read: > > $bytes_read = $string =~ sysread FILE, $bytes_to_read; RFC139 would enable precisely that capability. -- John Porter We're building the house of the future together.
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require expli... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require expli... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require expli... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require expli... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require expli... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require expli... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require expli... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require expli... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require expli... John Porter
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require expli... Bart Lateur
- New match and subst replacemen... John Porter
- New match and subst replacemen... Nathan Wiger
- Re: New match and subst replac... Mark Senn
- Re: New match and subst replac... Randy J. Ray
- Re: New match and subst replac... Nathan Wiger
- Re: New match and subst replac... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require expli... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require expli... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matc... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches,... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, even wi... Damian Conway