>Solve the larger problem: permit method calls in qq() strings. You mean outside of @{[ ... ]}, eh? :=}, I think Larry *might* have said something about making this work. I'm just a bit concerned with the general notion that functions would under some circumstances trigger in qq guys. It's a bit odd to explain that things like abs() for $n+3 won't work, but $o->foo() would. Then again, it's already curious with $a[$n+3]. :-) --tom
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Tom Christiansen
- working mnemonic for =~ David L. Nicol