David L. Nicol wrote: > John Porter wrote: > > > > "All flow control will implemented as longjumps." > > # language description has a lot to do. How does that validate the attitude, "Only GOTO considered harmless"??? -- John Porter
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs?) David L. Nicol
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFC... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFC... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFC... skud
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFC... John Porter
- extremely general top level t... David L. Nicol
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? John Porter
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Decklin Foster
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Steve Fink
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Damian Conway
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Larry Wall
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? David Corbin
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Ken Fox
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Joe McMahon
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Randal L. Schwartz