On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, David L. Nicol wrote: > There will Be No Perl7 Of course not. Odd numbers are the development releases. The next Perl after 6 will be 8. Seriously, while a worthwhile goal, this is rather short-sighted. The industry and the world will continue to change in spite (or because!) of our efforts here. We can make it easier for the users to adapt, but Perl will need to continue to evolve, as well. (As spoken by a one-eyebrow, knuckle-dragging Neanderthal....) -- Bryan C. Warnock ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs?) Larry Wall
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs?) Steve Fink
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need ... Steve Fink
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs?) David L. Nicol
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need ... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs... skud
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs... John Porter
- extremely general top level th... David L. Nicol
- Re: extremely general top leve... John Porter
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Decklin Foster
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Steve Fink
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Damian Conway
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Larry Wall