Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: > > I'll give you my comments right now ... It seems we are eliminating > punctuation to make the language simpler in one respect, yet, because > of that, creating new punctuation so that we can use the language in > ways we are used to. If that must be the case, then I say, if it > ain't broke, don't fix it! I think you're right. foo hash= bar; but then we may as well foo.hash_assign( bar ); And we don't want to go there. -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% John Porter