Damien Neil wrote: > > I'm not saying that Perl's choices are better than everyone else's; > they are, however, Perl's. True enough. > Are you saying that a tied $a should be able to return a list in list > context? I would hope not; this rather seriously breaks the principle > of least surprise. Oops! I misread what you wrote. -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Andy Wardley