On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, John Porter wrote: > Huh? They need to be "globals", because the "with" mechanism > is going to have to be able to write them into a symbol table. > You can't do this with lexicals. (Well, maybe that'll be different > in perl6?) Well, if you're using the HOF notation, I believe it works. Alternatively, the interpreter can simply DWIM and add in the appropriate derefed-hash-refs in the appropriate places. But globals is fine, as long as you save (localize) the old values first. Dave
- pascal-like "with" was Re: Default filehand... David L. Nicol
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Def... Johan Vromans
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re:... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was... John Porter
- Re: pascal-like "with"... Johan Vromans
- Re: pascal-like "with"... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Defa... Clayton Scott
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: ... Dave Storrs
- implied pascal-like "with" or "... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: implied pascal-like "with&qu... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "wi... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... Dave Storrs
- Re: implied pascal-like ... Brian Wheeler
- Re: implied pascal-like ... Jonathan Scott Duff