Dave Storrs wrote: > On 17 Aug 2000, Johan Vromans wrote: > > Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > 2) "express" should guarantee that, before it creates a variable > > > names $FOO, it first calls "local" on any existing $FOO > > > > Why, if the variable is lexical (see 3)? > > D'oh. s{2) .+^}{} > > Mismatch between brain and fingers there somewhere, thanks for > pointing it out. Huh? They need to be "globals", because the "with" mechanism is going to have to be able to write them into a symbol table. You can't do this with lexicals. (Well, maybe that'll be different in perl6?) -- John Porter
- pascal-like "with" was Re: Default filehand... David L. Nicol
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Def... Johan Vromans
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re:... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was... John Porter
- Re: pascal-like "with"... Johan Vromans
- Re: pascal-like "with"... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Defa... Clayton Scott
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: ... Dave Storrs
- implied pascal-like "with" or "... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: implied pascal-like "with&qu... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "wi... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... Dave Storrs