Well said! Nathan Torkington wrote: > > Dan Sugalski writes: > > Unfortunately, I think you're somewhat under-informed as to the inherent > > capabilities of people's brains. > > Ok, at this point I think all parties have to step away and let the > RFCs fall where they will. > > It's obvious that there are two types of people: those who don't mind > the punctuation, and those who do. We already know what Perl is like > with punctuation. Let the anti-punctuation folks make their RFCs, > and let Larry decide. > > I think they're wasting their time, but it's not about what I think. > > And somewhere within those python-esque convolutions, there may be > some ideas that Larry will adopt. > > Nat
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (string... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying c... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wit... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wit... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wit... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wit... Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying c... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Chaim Frenkel
- Hashes vs arrays (was Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wit... Kai Henningsen