Mike Rylander a écrit :
So it is written, so it shall be done.
It doesn't seem too off the mark (heh...) anyway, since the name
MARC::Record2 (and variants) has been bandied about quietly in the
past.
Thoughts/comments/sharp-sticks-in-the-eye?
+1 for kicking version number to 2.0.0
-9999 for using a MARC::Record2 or something like that.
It seems to me that the API didn't changed, there are only some nice new
features (including some UNIMARC specific ones, that we've tested & used
daily), that makes a +1 versionning a good idea.
--
Paul POULAIN et Henri Damien LAURENT
Consultants indépendants
en logiciels libres et bibliothéconomie (http://www.koha-fr.org)
Tel : 04 91 31 45 19
