Commit 1efb66c2b391 ("index: Add index and acronym tags, take two")
made this "sequential consistency" be listed under "Memory consistency".
But it is nothing to do with "memory consistency". So it should
not appear in the Index pages.
Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <aki...@gmail.com>
---
together/seqlock.tex | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/together/seqlock.tex b/together/seqlock.tex
index 7083e232..aa5afbab 100644
--- a/together/seqlock.tex
+++ b/together/seqlock.tex
@@ -132,9 +132,7 @@ notably in the dcache subsystem~\cite{NeilBrown2015RCUwalk}.
Note that it is likely that similar schemes also work with hazard
pointers.
-This approach provides
-\IXalth{sequential consistency}{sequential}{memory consistency}
-to successful readers,
+This approach provides sequential consistency to successful readers,
each of which will either see the effects of a given update or not,
with any partial updates resulting in a read-side retry.
Sequential consistency is an extremely strong guarantee, incurring equally
--
2.43.0
